01/06/2026
CORE HEART BUTTIES is a team of 2 secondary 1 girls (13yo)
They took part in the RCJ Rescue Line U19 Entry category in Singapore, coming in 4th
Disappointed by the result, they decided to give RoboCup Asia Pacific Tianjin Invitational a shot even though they would have to re-design their robot and code in a short 1+ months to move up to the RCAP category (intermediate in SG)
Seeing that they were crestfallen and given the short timeframe, I asked them if they would like to simply use their old EV3 robot (RoboCup SG Open U12 3rd place, RCAP Finals Qingdao U12 3rd, Best Learning Journal) and rework the code for an easier path to a result
They refused, wanting instead to prioritize learning
They chose to gut their EV3 robot, switching out the EV3 for an EVN and rebuilt some bits including 3D modelling some custom parts with for their sensors and gear train
Working overtime on the robot on their own over the few weekends we had, the kids have put in an admirable performance, coming in 2nd
More importantly, I'm glad that they chose not to take the easier way out
---
There is a Pareto front of winning and learning
Maximizing learning necessarily trades off against winning
However, the closer one moves to learning, the quicker one's Pareto front expands
I believe that the role of the coach is to:
1. Nudge students towards that Pareto front
2. Help students (and their parents) understand this joint optimization problem and be part of the decision making process
It is also certainly not to get kids to rote learn one particular solution (they have enough of that at school) which contributes next to nothing to their development as problem solvers
I'm really happy to have a group of enlightened families here at CORE that understand and believe in what I do
It's hard, lonely work standing up against the industry when winning, as the most visible signal, is used as a proxy variable for learning but it's all worth it seeing these kids grow up